[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705042259160.18504@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 23:02:07 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
cc: davej@...emonkey.org.uk,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
On May 4 2007 13:37, john stultz wrote:
>>
>> I found that setting the cpufreq governor to ondemand making the box
>> lock up solid in 2.6.20.2 and 2.6.21 after a few seconds. Sysrq
>> does not work anymore, and the last messages are:
>>
>> May 3 19:16:58 cn kernel: longhaul: VIA C3 'Nehemiah C' [C5P] CPU
>> detected. Powersaver supported.
>> May 3 19:16:58 cn kernel: longhaul: Using northbridge support.
>> May 3 19:17:22 cn kernel: Time: acpi_pm clocksource has been installed.
>> May 3 19:17:22 cn kernel: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -136422685
>> ns)
>
>What happens if you boot wihtout the ondemand governor but w/
>clocksource=acpi_pm ?
I always let it boot with the default gov (performance), then
use cpufreq-set to change it.
acpi_pm+performance behaves like tsc+performance, which works
When switching from tsc+performance to (tsc+)ondemand, acpi_pm gets
used because of the unstable tsc (of course, since we changed
frequency and the cpu does NOT have constant_tsc), so it's
becoming acpi_pm+ondemand naturally.
Switching from acpi_pm+performance to acpi_pm+ondemand also
locks up after a few minutes.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists