[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1178318978.6094.29.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 15:49:38 -0700
From: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: davej@...emonkey.org.uk,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 23:02 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On May 4 2007 13:37, john stultz wrote:
> >>
> >> I found that setting the cpufreq governor to ondemand making the box
> >> lock up solid in 2.6.20.2 and 2.6.21 after a few seconds. Sysrq
> >> does not work anymore, and the last messages are:
> >>
> >> May 3 19:16:58 cn kernel: longhaul: VIA C3 'Nehemiah C' [C5P] CPU
> >> detected. Powersaver supported.
> >> May 3 19:16:58 cn kernel: longhaul: Using northbridge support.
> >> May 3 19:17:22 cn kernel: Time: acpi_pm clocksource has been installed.
> >> May 3 19:17:22 cn kernel: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -136422685
> >> ns)
> >
> >What happens if you boot wihtout the ondemand governor but w/
> >clocksource=acpi_pm ?
>
> I always let it boot with the default gov (performance), then
> use cpufreq-set to change it.
>
> acpi_pm+performance behaves like tsc+performance, which works
>
> When switching from tsc+performance to (tsc+)ondemand, acpi_pm gets
> used because of the unstable tsc (of course, since we changed
> frequency and the cpu does NOT have constant_tsc), so it's
> becoming acpi_pm+ondemand naturally.
Ok. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't the ACPI PM that was broken and
when the system switched to it it was causing the hang.
> Switching from acpi_pm+performance to acpi_pm+ondemand also
> locks up after a few minutes.
Yep. Sounds like an ondemand issue. Thanks for verifying this for me.
-john
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists