linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "[PATCH] paravirt: Add startup infrastructure for paravirtualization"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070504.205037.91310159.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 04 May 2007 20:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ebiederm@...ssion.com
Cc:	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de,
	chrisw@...s-sol.org, jeremy@...p.org, zach@...are.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "[PATCH] paravirt: Add startup infrastructure
 for paravirtualization"

From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 21:14:42 -0600

> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> 
> > From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> > Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 11:22:48 +1000
> >
> >> Hi Eric,
> >
> > To all of those who don't speak "rusty", "Hi Soandso" means
> > "NAK".
> 
> The question between Rusty and myself is not if we should remove
> that code but when. 

I should have added a smiley face, sorry about that.

I was merely making a joke wrt. a recent blog entry of Rusty's:

	http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/index.cgi/tech/2007-05-04.html

:-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/