linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 2/3] SLUB: Implement targeted reclaim and partial list defragmentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070505053211.GZ19966@holomorphy.com>
Date:	Fri, 4 May 2007 22:32:11 -0700
From:	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To:	clameter@....com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, dgc@....com,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] SLUB: Implement targeted reclaim and partial list defragmentation

On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 03:15:57PM -0700, clameter@....com wrote:
> 2. kick_object(void *)
> After SLUB has established references to the remaining objects in a slab it
> will drop all locks and then use kick_object on each of the objects for which
> we obtained a reference. The existence of the objects is guaranteed by
> virtue of the earlier obtained reference. The callback may perform any
> slab operation since no locks are held at the time of call.
> The callback should remove the object from the slab in some way. This may
> be accomplished by reclaiming the object and then running kmem_cache_free()
> or reallocating it and then running kmem_cache_free(). Reallocation
> is advantageous at this point because it will then allocate from the partial
> slabs with the most objects because we have just finished slab shrinking.
> NOTE: This patch is for conceptual review. I'd appreciate any feedback
> especially on the locking approach taken here. It will be critical to
> resolve the locking issue for this approach to become feasable.
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>

kick_object() doesn't return an indicator of success, which might be
helpful for determining whether an object was successfully removed. The
later-added kick_dentry_object(), for instance, can't remove dentries
where reference counts are still held.

I suppose one could check to see if the ->inuse counter decreased, too.

In either event, it would probably be helpful to abort the operation if
there was a reclamation failure for an object within the slab.

This is a relatively minor optimization concern. I think this patch
series is great and a significant foray into the problem of slab
reclaim vs. fragmentation.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/