[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 17:30:51 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
CC: jirislaby@...il.com, akpm@...l.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>> I.e. no freezing of ports...
>
> Your patch to delete the 'return 1;' on error is correct,
> and makes the code match exactly the behaviour of previous
> versions of sata_promise, except for the additional error
> decoding.
>
> ahci and sata_sil24 do the return in this situation. I don't
> yet understand why they can get away with it while sata_promise
> cannot, but for now the return should be removed.
That's because sata_sil24 and ahci call either ata_port_abort() or
ata_port_freeze() prior to finishing error_intr routine. Both functions
abort all in-flight command and schedule EH.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists