[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070506202234.GB17957@robsims.com>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:22:34 -0600
From: Rob Sims <lkml-z@...sims.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Glanzmann <thomas@...nzmann.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Allgöwer <andreas.allgoewer@....de>,
Michael Gernoth <simigern@....informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: Re: sky2 PHY setup
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 11:53:48AM -0600, Rob Sims wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:19:30AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
...
> > You might have over run the hub and it wedged. Try doing:
> > ethtool -r eth0
> > that forces a down/up
>
> I'm still seeing throughput drop to under 1 Mb/s (50-100kB/s)
> periodically. I did an ethtool -S and ethtool -d to capture state.
> (sky2-fail.log). I ran ethtool -r and retested; no change
> (sky2-ethtool-r.log). Finally, ifdown - rmmod - modprobe - ifup, which
> restored to Gigabit speeds (96+ MB/s), (sky2-modcycle.log).
>
> Please let me know if there's anything else I can poke into. As a
> reminder, this is a 88E8053 r20. Next time I see a degradation, I'll
> try cycling the switch.
I continued to have problems with this interface. I tried bringing up
the second interface on the motherboard; I added a cable to the same hub
as the first interface and configured an address on the same subnet.
I intended to see if I could use it as a redundant interface for when
the first hung. I haven't been able to test that, because now I haven't
seen a hang or slowdown since I brought the second interface up.
Could the idle interface have generated an interrupt which is never
cleared because the interface is down? Or something similar?
--
Rob
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists