linux-kernel - Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class (was: battery class)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070506211307.GC10236@zarina>
Date:	Mon, 7 May 2007 01:13:07 +0400
From:	Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>
To:	pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>
Cc:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Shem Multinymous <multinymous@...il.com>,
	kernel-discuss@...dhelds.org
Subject: Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class
	(was: battery class)

On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 03:39:40PM +0200, pHilipp Zabel wrote:
> > > secondary notion too, as that is common.  It would be generic.
> > >
> > > Or maybe I just didn't get the idea behind the "type" attribute :-)
> > >
> > > I'd appreciate if these were documented in the text file.
> >
> > I think I got the start point of confusion. It's indeed bad to call such
> > power supply type as AC. Maybe I should it rename to ADAPTER? Or WALL?
> 
>  or MAINS?

Philipp, much thanks! MAINS indeed feels perfect for that.

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbou@...l.ru
backup email: ya-cbou@...dex.ru
irc://irc.freenode.org/bd2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/