[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070506215055.GA10538@zarina>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 01:50:55 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>
To: Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml@...il.com>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shem Multinymous <multinymous@...il.com>,
kernel-discuss@...dhelds.org
Subject: Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class
(was: battery class)
Hi Paul,
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 05:29:56PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello Anton,
>
> But in real world, it's rather common to colloquially name
> such kind of power "AC", and that's "term" is known to many-many
> people, and intuitively understood even for those, who didn't hit it yet.
> Actually, this discussion is good confirmation that's the case -
> people understand in what meaning it is used here, and go to point
> that it's not "scientifically" correct.
I fully agree here. Yes, AC is common term, but might be really
confusing for people who really know what AC is. ;-)
In past review we tried to drop any point of confusions (we agreed to
separate capacity, charge and energy terms), and now we've found
another point: AC, DC, MAINS. So, let's again eliminate any possibility
of confusion, and name things with correct terms.
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbou@...l.ru
backup email: ya-cbou@...dex.ru
irc://irc.freenode.org/bd2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists