[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <463F37A8.1020009@tmr.com>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 10:28:56 -0400
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: swap-prefetch: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Friday 04 May 2007 18:52, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> agreed. Con, IIRC you wrote a testcase for this, right? Could you please
>> send us the results of that testing?
>
> Yes, sorry it's a crappy test app but works on 32bit. Timed with prefetch
> disabled and then enabled swap prefetch saves ~5 seconds on average hardware
> on this one test case. I had many users try this and the results were between
> 2 and 10 seconds, but always showed a saving on this testcase. This effect
> easily occurs on printing a big picture, editing a large file, compressing an
> iso image or whatever in real world workloads. Smaller, but much more
> frequent effects of this over the course of a day obviously also occur and do
> add up.
>
I'll try this when I get the scheduler stuff done, and also dig out the
"resp1" stuff for "back when." I see the most recent datasets were
comparing 2.5.43-mm2 responsiveness with 2.4.19-ck7, you know I always
test your stuff ;-)
Guess it might need a bit of polish for current hardware, I was testing
on *small* machines, deliberately.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists