linux-kernel - Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4d8e3fd30705071343g221c75a8x737b8498c947fdef@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 7 May 2007 22:43:14 +0200
From:	"Paolo Ciarrocchi" <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com>
To:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Con Kolivas" <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	"Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...e.de>, "Mike Galbraith" <efault@....de>,
	"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>,
	"Peter Williams" <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, caglar@...dus.org.tr,
	"Willy Tarreau" <w@....eu>,
	"Gene Heskett" <gene.heskett@...il.com>, "Mark Lord" <lkml@....ca>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

On 5/7/07, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> i'm pleased to announce release -v10 of the CFS scheduler patchset.
> (The main goal of CFS is to implement "desktop scheduling" with as
>  high quality as technically possible.)
>
> The CFS patch against v2.6.21.1 (or against v2.6.20.10) can be
> downloaded from the usual place:
>
>     http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/
>
> -v10 got a bit bigger than usual. One reason for that is that i couldnt
> resist the fine enhancements contributed by Peter Williams and Mike
> Galbraith. Peter fixed and improved nice level support and SMP
> load-balancing, while Mike applied his "no compromises" interactivity
> tuning skills to CFS:
>
>     6 files changed, 247 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
>
> the main user-visible change should be that CFS's 3D gaming performance
> and 'smoothness' should be significantly improved in -v10. This was the
> main remaining regression reported for -v9 (and for CFS in general).

Ciao Ingo,
care to share some more information regarding how you fixed the "3D
gaming performance" issue?

Thanks!

Regards,
                 Paolo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/