[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a36005b50705071519k40449ed2p7b9ece22cc19219a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 15:19:22 -0700
From: "Ulrich Drepper" <drepper@...il.com>
To: "Davi Arnaut" <davi@...ent.com.br>
Cc: "Davide Libenzi" <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rfc: threaded epoll_wait thundering herd
On 5/7/07, Davi Arnaut <davi@...ent.com.br> wrote:
> See Linus's message on this same thread.
No. I'm talking about the userlevel side, not kernel side.
If a thread is canceled *after* it returns from the syscall but before
it reports the event to the call (i.e., while still in the syscall
wrapper, thread cancellation rules require a check there) the event is
lost.
Linus was only talking about the kernel side and how in the exit path
such events are not lost.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists