[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070507110256.GM7311@in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 16:32:56 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Cc: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@...fujitsu.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...tin.ibm.com>,
Joel Schopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] cpu-hotplug: Can't offline the CPU with naughty realtime processes
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 04:17:24PM +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> Nevertheless, with the freezer based approach that we're experimenting,
> this problem shouldn't arise. We expect the whole system to get frozen
> before we actually do a cpu_down() (which will then call
> __stop_machine_run). So any such rogue RT task will have to first fail
> the freezer ( which it will),
>From what I understand of the freezer, if the RT task is running in user
space (which seems to be the case in this thread), it should get frozen even
if it is a forever running SCHED_FIFO task at MAX_RT_PRIO -1 priority?
> but that's ok, since on a freezer-fail,
> we just thaw all the processes and get the system up and running again.
> Yeah, the cpu-hotplug operation will fail though.
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists