linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86-64 highres/dyntick support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 08 May 2007 11:51:03 +0200
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64 highres/dyntick support

On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 02:39 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:

> OK, looks very similar all things considered.  One thing I didn't do
> was fix lapic timer calibration (was hoping you'd do that part, and you
> did ;-)  I've noticed that something has changed and I'm seeing irq0
> handled on cpu3 (4 cpu system), where it used to be on cpu0 as expected.

Strange, irq balancing ?

> In addition lapic timer is firing there, and I'm seeing a higher
> interrupt load than I used to.  This is the same in your set and mine.

Is irq0 _and_ the lapic timer firing ?

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/