linux-kernel - Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11 (PCI_MULTITHREAD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 8 May 2007 15:37:13 +0200
From:	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Greg K-H <greg@...ah.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11
 (PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE)

As I wanted to add multithreaded probing for some s390 busses, I
discovered that the commit above removed the multithreaded probing
infrastructure again, while just some days before some of my patches
reworking it had been merged... I thought
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117591868412593&w=2 meant that we
should go ahead with per-subsystem multithreaded probing?

(OK, PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE should not depend on BROKEN, but on
EXPERIMENTAL with the reworked probing infrastructure. This got mixed
up, I can send a patch that changes it.)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/