[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46407ED4.9090301@rtr.ca>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 09:44:52 -0400
From: Mark Lord <liml@....ca>
To: Ben Collins <ben.collins@...ntu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...ntu.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup libata HPA support
Ben Collins wrote:
..
> static u64 ata_tf_to_lba48(struct ata_taskfile *tf)
> {
> - u64 sectors = 0;
> + u64 sectors;
> + u32 high, low;
>
> - sectors |= ((u64)(tf->hob_lbah & 0xff)) << 40;
> - sectors |= ((u64)(tf->hob_lbam & 0xff)) << 32;
> - sectors |= (tf->hob_lbal & 0xff) << 24;
> - sectors |= (tf->lbah & 0xff) << 16;
> - sectors |= (tf->lbam & 0xff) << 8;
> - sectors |= (tf->lbal & 0xff);
> + high = (tf->hob_lbah << 16) |
> + (tf->hob_lbam << 8) |
> + tf->hob_lbal;
> + low = (tf->lbah << 16) |
> + (tf->lbam << 8) |
> + tf->lbal;
>
> - return ++sectors;
> + sectors = ((u64)high << 24) | low;
> +
> + return sectors + 1;
> }
Ben, I very much prefer the fixed version of this function
as implemented by the patch above.
But.. is the original code actually broken, or just messy?
Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists