lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070508134928.GA13212@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 8 May 2007 14:49:28 +0100
From:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...il.nowhere.org>
Subject: Please revert 86c0baf123e474b6eb404798926ecf62b426bf3a

The change:

+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+#define __INIT		.section	".text","ax"
+#define __INITDATA	.section	".data","aw"
+#else
 #define __INIT		.section	".init.text","ax"
-#define __FINIT		.previous
 #define __INITDATA	.section	".init.data","aw"
+#endif
+#define __FINIT		.previous

breaks ARM, since the ARM startup code moves from the start of the image
to somewhere in the middle of the kernel image.  (That's trivially fixable.)

Besides that, this change is also wrong because not all assembly marked
__INIT needs to be moved into the standard .text segment when hotplug CPU
is enabled.  Ditto for __INITDATA.

One is left wondering why the original patch proposers didn't:

1. Invent __CPUINIT and __CPUINITDATA, to be consistent with __init vs
   __cpuinit.

2. copy other architecture maintainers.

Shall I invent __CPUINIT to mark data to always be thrown away, or are
the x86 folk going to withdraw this patch and do it properly?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ