[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070508155449.GB13212@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:54:50 +0100
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...il.nowhere.org>
Subject: Re: Please revert 86c0baf123e474b6eb404798926ecf62b426bf3a
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:19:46AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >On Tue, 8 May 2007, Russell King wrote:
> >
> >>Shall I invent __CPUINIT to mark data to always be thrown away, or are
> >>the x86 folk going to withdraw this patch and do it properly?
> >>
> >
> >I can certainly revert the patch, but it would probably be better if you
> >were to just start adding the infrastructure you need and send it as a new
> >patch instead (where the revert is part of it, and the __CPUINIT is
> >additional).
>
> I've sent Russell a new patch to test off-list. He or I will submit a
> fix here after he tests.
I'm not sure it'd make much sense for me to test it - I don't have x86
based test boxes here.
Assuming your intention is to revert this commit and replace it with your
patch which doesn't change the semantics of __INIT, it shouldn't cause me
any problems.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists