linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.21-mm1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705080906290.8722@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 May 2007 09:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-mm1

On Tue, 8 May 2007, Andy Whitcroft wrote:

> The SLUB code introduces the config segment below to stop SLUB being
> used on powerpc:
> 
>     config ARCH_USES_SLAB_PAGE_STRUCT
>        bool
>        default y
>        depends on SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS <= NR_CPUS
> 
> However as far as I can kconfig has no support for operators other than
> ==, !=, &&, and ||.  Who can say why we do not get an error.
> 
> Cirtainly in my testing this simply never triggers and bad kernels result.
> 
> Thoughts?

Get rid of the whole patch as soon as possible? It seems that PPC work is 
in progress to make SLUB work in all configurations.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/