[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705081807100.16923@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 18:09:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...os.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-git8+ BUG: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU1
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> happens when a local process sends packets with invalid IP headers
> through raw sockets.
[...]
> Whatever happens, that printk should be toned down, shouldn't it? We
> prefer to not let unprivileged apps spam the logs.
Isn't "unprivileged app sending packet through raw socket" an oxymoron? As
Patrick pointed out, the message is there for a reason, I'd suggest using
printk_ratelimit() in this case.
--
Jiri Kosina
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists