linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Intel IXP4xx network drivers v.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4640B3EE.1020707@wpkg.org>
Date:	Tue, 08 May 2007 19:31:26 +0200
From:	Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...g.org>
To:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Cc:	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>,
	Alexey Zaytsev <alexey.zaytsev@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Jones <mlj28@....ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel IXP4xx network drivers v.2 - Ethernet and HSS

Krzysztof Halasa schrieb:
> Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org> writes:
> 
>> There _is_ an ARM BE version of Debian.
>>
>> It's not an official port, but it's not maintained any worse than
>> the 'official' LE ARM Debian port is.
> 
> Hmm... That changes a bit. Perhaps we should forget about
> that LE thing then, and (at best) put that trivial workaround?

Does using ixp4xx on LE have any other drawbacks than inferior network 
performance?

And talking about network performance, what numbers are we talking about 
(LE vs BE; 30% performance hit on LE, more, or less)?


-- 
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/