linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 08 May 2007 14:05:49 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
CC:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil

Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> writes:
>
>   
>> Since 'volatile' has two different semantics depending on the context in 
>> which it is used, this warning should be appended to include the fact that 
>> it is legitimate to use for inline assembly.
>>     
>
> I think it hasn't two semantics, it's like arguing that char has two
> semantics.
>   

No, David means that "asm volatile (...)" is meaningful and OK to use.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/