linux-kernel - RE: Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705072150490.4939@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Mon, 7 May 2007 21:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
cc:	"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@...el.com>,
	"Wang, Peter Xihong" <peter.xihong.wang@...el.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: RE: Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark

On Mon, 7 May 2007, Tim Chen wrote:

> However, the output from TCP_STREAM is quite stable.  
> I am still seeing a 4% difference between the SLAB and SLUB kernel.
> Looking at the L2 cache miss rate with emon, I saw 6% more cache miss on
> the client side with SLUB.  The server side has the same amount of cache
> miss.  This is test under SMP mode with client and server bound to
> different core on separate package.

If this is cache miss related then a larger page order may take are 
of this. Boot with (assume you got 2.6.21-mm1 at least...)

slub_min_order=6 slub_max_order=7

which will give you an allocation unit of 256k. Just tried it. It 
actually works but has no effect here whatsoever on UP netperf 
performance. netperf performance dropped from 6MB(slab)/6.2MB(slub) on 
2.6.21-rc7-mm1 to 4.5MB (both) on 2.6.21-mm1. So I guess there is 
something also going on with the networking layer.

Still have not found a machine here where I could repeat your 
results.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/