linux-kernel - Re: [spi-devel-general] adding bits_per_word to struct spi_board_info to mirror struct spi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 8 May 2007 01:24:14 -0400
From:	"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To:	"David Brownell" <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc:	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	"Wu, Bryan" <Bryan.Wu@...log.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [spi-devel-general] adding bits_per_word to struct spi_board_info to mirror struct spi_device

On 5/8/07, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
> On Monday 07 May 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 4/25/07, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 25 April 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > is there something obvious i'm missing ?  seems to me that if the
> > > > generic spi framework respects bits_per_word on a per-spi device
> > > > basis, then it should be exposed in the generic info structure so that
> > > > the setting can be tracked in the boards file ...
> > >
> > > The initial driver set didn't need it, that's all.  ISTR someone
> > > else pointed out this quirk, but never provided a patch to resolve
> > > the issue.
> >
> > so which direction should it be ?  or should it be both ? :)
>
> Add bits_per_word to spi_board_info, and have the device creation
> logic copy it into spi_device as it's created.

OK

> > Blackfin at the moment is doing DMA/bits_per_word setup in the boards
> > ... we could move these to the drivers and have each one just call
> > spi_setup() at init, or i could post a patch for the common framework
> > if you think that's an OK direction to [also] go ...
>
> I don't see what you're getting at here.  The SPI core doesn't
> do anything with DMA, beyond passing DMA addresses through when
> necessary.  (Needed to handle messages derived from scatterlists,
> since I don't want lower layers to know scatterlists, but otherwise
> uncommon.)

sorry, i didnt mean to confuse things ... i was referring to the only
things that we are configuring at the moment on a per-spi device basis
in Blackfin is bits_per_word and DMA status ... when i said posting a
patch for common framework, i was referring to just bits_per_word
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/