[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46410F1D.8060808@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 17:00:29 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil
David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>> It's already there, isn't it? <quote from original:>
>>
>> The only acceptable uses for "volatile" are:
>>
>> - in _code_, i.e., for things like the definition of "readb()" etc, where we
>> use it to force a particular access.
>> - with inline asms
>> - on "jiffies", for stupid legacy reasons
>>
>> </quote>
>>
>> or are you saying that you want to subject/header/title modified also?
>>
>
> I wasn't aware that you were considering the inclusion of Linus' entire
> email in the document. There exists a point where CodingStyle becomes so
> large that people choose not to read it in its entirety, so I was
> expecting only an addition that would explicit document the acceptable and
> unacceptable uses of 'volatile' in kernel code with perhaps a link to his
> email.
but I wouldn't put it into CodingStyle.
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists