| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20070507223738.57d763da.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 22:37:38 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> Subject: Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1) On Mon, 7 May 2007 22:31:32 -0700 William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com> wrote: > On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote: > >> I'm using wli's 8k > >> stack + irq stack patches with good success though. > > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:24:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > wlis are handy. > > I think Andi's handling the mergework on those patches, but I'll check > in to see if I should rediff vs. -mm or what if you want them. > > Andi, what's the verdict on those stack patches? > Whoa. The verdict is usually "don't use so much stack". Do we know what has gone wrong here? Last week Jens said he was picking up the ancient md-dm-reduce-stack-usage-with-stacked-block-devices.patch, but he doesn't seem to have done so yet. XFS is frequently implicated. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists