[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <464169C8.9060002@drzeus.cx>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 08:27:20 +0200
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] MMC updates
Nick Piggin wrote:
>> @@ -501,9 +501,9 @@ void mmc_detect_change(struct mmc_host *host,
>> unsigned long delay)
>> {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_MMC_DEBUG
>> unsigned long flags;
>> - spin_lock_irqsave(host->lock, flags);
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
>> BUG_ON(host->removed);
>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->lock, flags);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>> #endif
>
> Do you actually need the lock there at all? What is it protecting?
>
It makes sure we don't have any race when it comes to modifying
host->removed. We had some problems where controllers reported card
insertion events even after they'd signaled to be removed, causing all
kind of odd problems. This check was added to easier spot it should it
arise again.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists