[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070509001032.dbb982ca.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 00:10:32 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] clockevents: Fix resume logic - updated version
On Tue, 8 May 2007 22:59:20 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 06 May 2007 17:03:03 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> > Andrew,
> >
> > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 13:51 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Fixup the existing users.
> > > >
> > > > This one makes the Vaio-of-fun hang during suspend to disk. It gets
> > > > up to "swsusp: critical section/: done (%d pages copied)" then it
> > > > freezes.
> > >
> > > after trying to reproduce it on 2 boxes without success it did trigger
> > > some sw-suspend weirdness on a third box :) We are debugging it now.
> >
> > find an updated patch below. It fixes the problem on Ingo's
> > VAIO-of-fun-emulator and I got confirmation from several other affected
> > users, that the patch series is still solving their problems.
> >
>
> The machine is still hanging with this patch applied.
>
> suspend-to-disk gets up to "swsusp: critical section: done (NNN pages copied)"
>
> No netconsole, no printk-timestamping.
>
> ho hum, I guess I get to debug this.
It got ugly.
We finish swsusp_save() and a few other functions then we go
hibernate
->platform_finish
->acpi_hibernation_finish
->acpi_leave_sleep_state
->acpi_evaluate_object
and there it dies, in this call:
status = acpi_evaluate_object(NULL, METHOD_NAME__WAK, &arg_list, NULL);
I wonder how your patch caused that?
<debugs further>
OK, it gets to the last statement in acpi_evaluate_object():
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
but doesn't hit the printk on return to the caller,
acpi_leave_sleep_state().
A working theory would be that something we did trashed the stack in
acpi_evaluate_object().
<switches from 8k stacks to 4k. No change>
foo. I'm not sure what to do now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists