lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 9 May 2007 01:43:28 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	efault@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: multi-second freezes with current GIT?

On Tue, 08 May 2007 23:23:26 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 05:29:20 +0200
> 
> > On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 18:44 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > I've been noticing this off and on for the past week or so.
> > > 
> > > The system seems to jam up for several seconds, anything that would
> > > need to read from disk just sits there during this time.  I think it's
> > > correlated with generating a lot of dirty write data.
> > > 
> > > My mouse moves around in X etc. so it really is only processes that
> > > need to read from disk that get stuck.
> > > 
> > > Perhaps it's a side effect of those dirty ratio changes Linus made to
> > > start off the 2.6.22 merge cycle?
> > 
> > Uhoh, that seems highly likely.
> > 
> > I think those changes may have been triggered by my repeatable and truly
> > horrible system stalls when writing to an ext3 data=ordered nearly full
> > filesystem.  Anything that does fdatasync() and/or fsync() can cause
> > very bad experiences indeed.  KDE's little menu/program launcher
> > doohickey does fdatasync() for some odd reason, which has utterly killed
> > my entire GUI for up to and including 20 minutes at a whack.
> > 
> > Switching to data=writeback cured those horrors.  Lowering the dirty
> > ratio reduced the agony of data=ordered tremendously, but didn't make it
> > even remotely acceptable.
> 
> I'm using data=ordered on my partitions too.


does

echo 40 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
echo 10 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio

fix it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ