[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070509085611.GA4431@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 14:26:12 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@...fujitsu.com>, vatsa@...ibm.com,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...tin.ibm.com>,
Joel Schopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, paulmck@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] cpu-hotplug: Can't offline the CPU with naughty realtime processes
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:47:50AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> We've seen the same problem with other stop_machine_run sites in the kernel.
> module remove was one.
>
> Reserving the top priority slot for stop machine (and migration thread, I
> guess) isn't a bad idea.
I second this thought.
The process freezer, if used will only safeguard cpu-hotplug, but not other
sites which use stop_machine_run.
>
> --
> SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Regards
gautham.
--
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists