[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1178713442.3042.480.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 14:24:02 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] clockevents: Fix resume logic - updated version
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 13:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 10:59, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 01:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > I suspect I just tested the wrong thing yesterday. Let me recheck just
> > > > these patches against 2.6.21.
> > >
> > > yup, same hang with just these three:
> > >
> > > origin
> > > clocksource-fix-resume-logic
> > > clockevents-fix-resume-logic-updated-version
> >
> > I have no idea, how this affects acpi_evaluate_object()
>
> I think the problem is that the ACPI code ordering here is broken in a
> difficult to fix way.
Any explanation aside of witchcraft why this is affected by the clock
event resume changes ?
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists