[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070507200245.GA3868@ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 20:02:45 +0000
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Hans-J?rgen Koch <hjk@...utronix.de>,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benedikt Spranger <b.spranger@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] UIO patches for 2.6.21
Hi!
> > > I agree, if we make it entirely clear that the flag is nonpolitical.
> >
> > Hm, I don't know, what makes this different from the fact that we can
> > mmap PCI device space today through the proc and sysfs entries? That's
> > how X gets direct access to the hardware for a number of different
> > cards, and that's pretty much the same thing as the UIO interface is
> > doing.
> >
> > Unless you think we should also use the same "taint" flag on those
> > accesses too, and if so, I have no objection.
>
> Right, this is just a hint, that something in user space is accessing
> the hardware directly. Not a too bad idea, but pretty much useless when
> we add X to the picture as it will be set always :)
Some people -- like me -- use X68_fbcon over vesafb, in order not to
be tainted this way.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists