[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705091512.13171.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 15:12:12 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] clockevents: Fix resume logic - updated version
On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 14:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 13:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 10:59, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 01:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > I suspect I just tested the wrong thing yesterday. Let me recheck just
> > > > > these patches against 2.6.21.
> > > >
> > > > yup, same hang with just these three:
> > > >
> > > > origin
> > > > clocksource-fix-resume-logic
> > > > clockevents-fix-resume-logic-updated-version
> > >
> > > I have no idea, how this affects acpi_evaluate_object()
> >
> > I think the problem is that the ACPI code ordering here is broken in a
> > difficult to fix way.
>
> Any explanation aside of witchcraft why this is affected by the clock
> event resume changes ?
Well, where is unregister_time_interpolator() called from?
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists