[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705092253.49896.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 22:53:49 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] clockevents: Fix resume logic - updated version
On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 22:45, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 20:36 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Well, apparently, not in -mm2:
> >
> > rafael@...ercik:~/src/mm/linux-2.6.21-mm2> grep -r -I -l 'timekeeping_resume' *
> > kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> > rafael@...ercik:~/src/mm/linux-2.6.21-mm2> grep clocksource_resume kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> > rafael@...ercik:~/src/mm/linux-2.6.21-mm2>
>
> Andrew dropped the patch because it did not work on his jinxed VAIO, but
> he debugged with the patch applied.
I see.
In that case, since timekeeping_resume() is called via sysdev_resume, then it's
executed before acpi_leave_sleep_state() and may very well interfere with the
ACPI methods executed from there, depending on what's happening in the
cs->resume() callbacks in clocksource_resume().
Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists