linux-kernel - Different scheduler behavior between 2.4 and 2.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e810d8480705092246k1bb9afe6ma253fd7679f5031a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 May 2007 13:46:53 +0800
From:	"Quan Sun" <cfk.quan@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Different scheduler behavior between 2.4 and 2.6

Hi,
  Recently I met a problem on different scheduler behavior between
2.4.22 and 2.6.18.8.
  The application works as a proxy, it listen on an interface,
connect through another interface. This application works on a box
with two Xeon cpu, each of them is hyper-threading.
  On 2.4.22, CPU0 serve interrupts, the application works on other
three CPUs.
  But on 2.6.18.8, if I turn on 'noirqbalance' kernel parameter, and no
irqbalance  process, the application will stuck to CPU0 as well as interrupts
after several seconds' working. Then there will be a 0% idle cpu, and
three 100%idle CPUs.

 /proc/interrupt shows all eths's interrupts are working at CPU0.

 It seems that scheduler ignores the working load of interrupts.

  My question is, is there a way to tune 2.6 kernel working as 2.4?
Just one cpu for interrupts, other three cpu for normal work.

-- 
Quan Sun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/