linux-kernel - Re: remove broken URLs from net drivers' output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9a8748490705100244v58cc6ac5x1d575d177f6f62a1@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 May 2007 11:44:45 +0200
From:	"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To:	"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	"Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Markus Dahms" <dahms@...brandenburg.de>
Subject: Re: remove broken URLs from net drivers' output

On 10/05/07, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:22:59AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >> I thought it was just an informal tag to mark which people did agree with
> >> the patch (and the line between your "Makes good sense to me." and a "Feel
> >> free to add my ACK to this" is really thin).
> >
> > No, the line is easy and obvious:  if there is any doubt, DO NOT ASSUME.
> >
> > If they do not explicitly ACK it, then do not presume to speak for them.
>
> There is no doubt that Jesper did explicitly ACK the patch.
> We are ONLY discussing whether his informal ACK can be translated into
> an "Acked-by:" line.
>
Right. The patch is fine. What I said when I commented on it was an
ACK, that's not being debated.
I just thought that Acked-by: was considered a lot more formal and was
surprised to see that line with my name on the patch. But I've since
checked up on that assumption and I can't find anything that states
that it is considered as formal as I thought it was, so the mistake is
all mine and what you did is fine.

If Acked-by: should be made more formal or not is a different discussion.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/