[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705101143540.32349@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:48:48 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 002 of 2] md: Improve the is_mddev_idle test
On May 10 2007 16:22, NeilBrown wrote:
>
>diff .prev/drivers/md/md.c ./drivers/md/md.c
>--- .prev/drivers/md/md.c 2007-05-10 15:51:54.000000000 +1000
>+++ ./drivers/md/md.c 2007-05-10 16:05:10.000000000 +1000
>@@ -5095,7 +5095,7 @@ static int is_mddev_idle(mddev_t *mddev)
> *
> * Note: the following is an unsigned comparison.
> */
>- if ((curr_events - rdev->last_events + 4096) > 8192) {
>+ if ((long)curr_events - (long)rdev->last_events > 4096) {
> rdev->last_events = curr_events;
> idle = 0;
> }
What did really change? Unless I am seriously mistaken,
curr_events - last_evens + 4096 > 8192
is mathematically equivalent to
curr_events - last_evens > 4096
The casting to (long) may however force a signed comparison which turns
things quite upside down, and the comment does not apply anymore.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists