[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070510035207.37a528ae.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 03:52:07 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/13] i386 sg: add support for chaining scatterlists
On Thu, 10 May 2007 12:46:53 +0200 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 10 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Yeah, I'm inclined to agree. Perhaps it would be better to put this
> > stuff in lib/scatterlist.c or something like that instead?
> >
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Chain previous sglist to this one
> > > > + */
> > > > +static inline void sg_chain(struct scatterlist *prv, unsigned int prv_nents,
> > > > + struct scatterlist *sgl)
> > > > +{
> > > > +#ifndef ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN
> > > > + BUG();
> > > > +#endif
> > >
> > > Can use BUILD_BUG_ON here. Or just #error.
> >
> > Good idea, thanks!
>
> No wait a second, that wont work. The code is always being built in sg
> scsi_lib.c, it should just not be called unless we can do chaining. We
> will never have a large number of segments that require chaining without
> ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN, so it'll never be called in that case. So it has to
> remain as it is, a BUG().
Confused. If it should never be called, why does it even get compiled in?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists