[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4642FB1B.80702@panasas.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:59:39 +0300
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/13] i386 sg: add support for chaining scatterlists
Jens Axboe wrote:
> +#define sg_is_chain(sg) ((unsigned long) (sg)->page & 0x01)
> +#define sg_chain_ptr(sg) \
> + ((struct scatterlist *) ((unsigned long) (sg)->page & ~0x01))
> +
> +/*
> + * We overload the meaning of ->page for sg chaining. If the LSB is
> + * set, the page member contains a pointer to the next sgtable.
> + */
> +static inline struct scatterlist *sg_next(struct scatterlist *sg)
> +{
> + if (sg_is_chain(sg))
> + return sg_chain_ptr(sg);
> +
> + return sg + 1;
> +}
Jens, should sg_next ever return the sg containing the chain link?
If sg points at the entry right before the link entry, don't we
want to skip it?
E.g.:
static inline struct scatterlist *sg_next(struct scatterlist *sg)
{
struct scatterlist *next;
/* just in case, shouldn't really ever be here */
if (sg_is_chain(sg))
return sg_chain_ptr(sg);
next = sg + 1;
if (sg_is_chain(next))
return sg_chain_ptr(next);
return next;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists