[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070510113045.GD14898@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:30:45 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, discuss@...-64.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] pte_{ex,rd}protect
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:52:32AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Various architectures define these, but they aren't being used anywhere -
> candidates for removal? The more that (at least) on i386 and x86-64
> pte_exprotect() is not symmetrical to pte_exec() and pte_mkexec()...
They should be removed everywhere imho
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists