[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1358.81.207.0.53.1178799167.squirrel@secure.samage.net>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:12:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Indan Zupancic" <indan@....nu>
To: "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>, duncan.sands@...e.fr
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [git patch] move USB net drivers to drivers/net
Hello,
On Thu, May 10, 2007 03:38, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> This was ACK'd by Greg, as you see in the sign-offs. See the commit
> below for rationale.
>
> USB is now treated like other buses, for network drivers:
> * USB network driver patches should go to me and netdev
> * Just like in PCI or PCMCIA land, bus-specific code may
> originate from the USB side of the house (Greg's tree).
>
>
>
> Please pull from 'usb-move' branch of
> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git usb-move
>
> to receive the following update:
>
>
> commit 5b2fc499917e5897a13add780e181b4cef197072
> Author: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
> Date: Wed May 9 21:31:55 2007 -0400
>
> Move USB network drivers to drivers/net/usb.
>
> It is preferable to group drivers by usage (net, scsi, ATA, ...) than
> by bus. When reviewing drivers, the [PCI|USB|PCMCIA|...] maintainer
> is probably less qualified on networking issues than a networking
> maintainer. Also, from a practical standpoint, chips often
> appear on multiple buses, which is why we do not put drivers into
> drivers/pci/net.
What about drivers/usb/atm/?
Greetings,
Indan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists