[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1178760632.7286.187.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:30:32 +1000
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"virtualization@...ts.osdl.org" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: lguest re-review
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 17:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:24:08 +1000
> Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 02:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Some concern was expressed over the lguest review status, so I shall send
> > > the patches out again for people to review, to test, to make observations
> > > about the author's personal appearance, etc.
> >
> > Thanks Andrew,
> >
> > This means I can finally ack this patch (thanks Eric):
> >
> > From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
> > Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[PATCH] paravirt: Add startup infrastructure for paravirtualization"
> >
> > This reverts commit c9ccf30d77f04064fe5436027ab9d2230c7cdd94.
>
> I don't get it. Does lguest no longer need this code, or will
> it be reintroduced with an lguest merge, or something else?
Lguest no longer needs it (the magic signature patch you took).
HPA and Eric are brewing a new, shinier way for booting not-a-normal-pc
which will address lguest as well as others. But it seems they first
need to go through the "who knows most about ancient PCs" slapfight.
Thanks!
Rusty.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists