linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] ext2: remove inode constructor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020705100556x2fd70556p37cde356520e515d@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 May 2007 15:56:47 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sct@...hat.com,
	adilger@...sterfs.com, clameter@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ext2: remove inode constructor

On 5/9/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> ext2 has no truncate_mutex.

I think it does:

-               mutex_init(&ei->truncate_mutex);
-               inode_init_once(&ei->vfs_inode);
-       }
-}

And fs/ext2/super.c:init_once() from 2.6.21-mm2 says:

                mutex_init(&ei->truncate_mutex);
                inode_init_once(&ei->vfs_inode);
        }
}

Hmm?

On 5/9/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> These patches are rather tangled up with the unmerged __GFP_RECLAIMABLE
> stuff.  I'll duck them for now.

Ok. I would appreciate any kind of heads-up when you're ready to eat
these patches again. ;-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/