linux-kernel - Re: HDIO_DRIVE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46431C12.1030207@rtr.ca>
Date:	Thu, 10 May 2007 09:20:18 -0400
From:	Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HDIO_DRIVE_CMD and hdparm

Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 	Hi,
> 
> `hdparm -t' uses HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) to flush the disk's buffer.

More correctly, that command is supposed to act like an I/O queue "barrier"
operation, not returning from the syscall until everything queued in front
of it has been issued/completed.

I believe that only the original IDE driver actually implements it, though.
And hdparm-7.4 (not released yet) will no longer complain about ENOTTY.

Note that current versions of hdparm use SG_IO/ATA_16 (SAT) for nearly everything
now, only falling back to the older ioctl's for drivers which reject the SAT attempt.

I'd love to find a USB drive enclosure that supports SAT.
Anyone know of one?

And does the USB storage layer actually pass the ATA_16 packets to the device?

Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/