[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46431FEC.7000901@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 09:36:44 -0400
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re: [bisect] NFS regression breaks X
Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 15:52 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> It's a bit rough that Jeff spent a large amount of time hunting down an
>> already-known bug. That's normally my job :(
>
> The bug was reported by Florin Iucha (on lkml!) on Saturday. It has only
> just been debugged, and I was in fact in the middle of marshalling the
> fixes.
>
>> This five-week-old diff only ever appeared in 2.6.21-mm1, which was
>> released four days ago. It was then whizzed into mainline. We thus lost
>> five weeks public testing which would probably have saved Jeff his pain.
>>
>> What went wrong?
>
> Probably my fault. I've had a couple of weeks of heavy travel due to
> various circumstances that were beyond my control, and so I had little
> time in which to test the stuff and push it out.
>
> Another factor that is affecting us is the slow but gradual collapse of
> the OSDL NFSv4 regression testing effort.
I had expected that many of these issues would be caught by the OSDL
test harness. I learned only yesterday that it was no longer available,
so I am making an effort to broaden my personal test regime.
View attachment "chuck.lever.vcf" of type "text/x-vcard" (292 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists