[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070510141942.GM14898@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:19:42 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>, ak@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Andi, you broke my laptop :-)
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:35:56PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:01:44PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 12:56:16PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > > Hi, Andi:
> > >
> > > The attached patch (actually, git show output) makes my Dell 1501 to hang
> > > on boot. Sorry, I have no clue why... The culprit is found with git bisect.
> > > But yes, it's an AMD MK-36. I use an x86_64 kernel. It is 100% reproducible.
> >
> > MK-36? Does it have SVM?
> >
> > Anyways we previously had issues with this being miscompiled, but
> > I thought the latest patch should have been ok. What compiler do you use?
> >
> > Can you send me a disassembly listing of arch/x86_64/kernel/time.o?
>
> I debugged this problem a bit and my compiler[1]interprets the =A
> constraint as %rax instead of %edx:%eax on x86_64 which causes the
> problem. The appended patch provides a workaround for this and fixed the
> hang on my machine.
Hmm yes now I can reproduce it too. I didn't see any hangs so i suppose
my (and that of most -mm tester's) compiled binary always happened to have a
suitable value in edx
Thanks for the patch.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists