[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46434378.1020900@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 18:08:24 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
CC: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, ak@...e.de, jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [patch 8/9] lguest: the block driver
On 05/09/2007 12:22 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> +static void end_entire_request(struct request *req, int uptodate)
>> +{
>> + if (end_that_request_first(req, uptodate, req->hard_nr_sectors))
>> + BUG();
>> + add_disk_randomness(req->rq_disk);
>> + blkdev_dequeue_request(req);
>> + end_that_request_last(req, uptodate);
>> +}
>
> Again, I would prefer this went straight into block/ll_rw_blk.c. Rene
> and I am using something similar in the new Mitsumi driver although
> one of us has a bug already, we're using req->nr_sectors for this...
The req->hard_nr_sectors is specifically marked block layer internal and
since nr_sectors is what we're requesting and reading (we can't deal with
partial transfers anyway since the drive won't tell us where it failed as
far as I've been able to see and we do want to make read requests for as
many sectors as possible at a time for speed) I believe that in our case the
nr_sectors is fine.
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists