[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705101859.11696.christiand59@web.de>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 18:59:11 +0200
From: Christian <christiand59@....de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v11
Hello lkml, hello Ingo!
I've been using CFS-v10 for a few days and I must say that I'm verry
impressed ;-)
Desktop performance without any manual renicing is excellent, even with
make -j20. Gaming performance is at least on par with SD now! I've tried to
change the sched_load_smoothing config to "8" but there is no visible
difference when it's set to "7".
Both schedulers are verrry good! I can't really tell which one is better.
I noticed that while compiling a kernel (with -j4) my CPU temperature is two
to three degrees hotter than with mainline. I have not done any timing tests,
but I suspect that it's a little faster while preserving excellent desktop
usability. Great work!! :-)
-Christian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists