[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705110022.55862.ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 00:22:54 +0200
From: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>
To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Tomas Janousek <tjanouse@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tsmetana@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce boot based time
Hi John and Tomas,
On Thursday 10 May 2007, john stultz wrote:
> I'm not sure I follow this.
>
> total_sleep_time stores seconds. So on 32bit systems that's 130some
> years, so it shouldn't be an issue.
>
> Is the reason you want it to be a ktime is because you want a way to
> keep sub-second sleep granularity?
No, I'm just overworked and getting sloppy :-/
Sorry for the noise...
Best regards
Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists