[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46429801.8030202@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:56:49 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
CC: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: swap-prefetch: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
Ray Lee wrote:
> On 5/9/07, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote:
>
>> You said it helped with the updatedb problem. That says we should look at
>> why it is going bad first, and for example improve use-once algorithms.
>> After we do that, then swap prefetching might still help, which is fine.
>
>
> Nick, if you're volunteering to do that analysis, then great. If not,
> then you're just providing a airy hope with nothing to back up when or
> if that work would ever occur.
I'd like to try helping. Tell me your problem.
> Further, if you or someone else *does* do that work, then guess what,
> we still have the option to rip out the swap prefetching code after
> the hypothetical use-once improvements have been proven and merged.
> Which, by the way, I've watched people talk about since 2.4. That was,
> y'know, a *while* ago.
What's wrong with the use-once we have? What improvements are you talking
about?
> So enough with the stop energy, okay? You're better than that.
I don't think it is about energy or being mean, I'm just stating the
issues I have with it.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists