[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070510233527.GA19597@linux-sh.org>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 08:35:27 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Slab allocators: Drop support for destructors
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:00:08PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> As far as I can tell there is only a single slab destructor left (there
> is currently another in i386 but its going to go as soon as Andi merges
> i386s support for quicklists).
>
> I wonder how difficult it would be to remove it? If we have no need for
> destructors anymore then maybe we could remove destructor support from the
> slab allocators? There is no point in checking for destructor uses in
> the slab allocators if there are none.
>
> Or are there valid reason to keep them around? It seems they were mainly
> used for list management which required them to take a spinlock. Taking a
> spinlock in a destructor is a bit risky since the slab allocators may run
> the destructors anytime they decide a slab is no longer needed.
>
> Or do we want to continue support destructors? If so why?
>
[snip pmb stuff]
I'll take a look at tidying up the PMB slab, getting rid of the dtor
shouldn't be terribly painful. I simply opted to do the list management
there since others were doing it for the PGD slab cache at the time that
was written.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists